On Photography


Worthless


What good are the arts? It's a conclusive question postulated by a soulless age that lay unanswerable; Nothing nada, zero, for good in a politically charged age means "pragmatic value." Art has no such thing. All art is no good. It has no pragmatic value.

Art like the gifts of St. Peter cannot be so bought or sold. Art cannot be "used."  It is useless.

This definition of art rests on a threefold nature of all created reality; the good, the true, and the beautiful.

The mimetic quality of art is its whole spiritual value. It is to be associated by what is, not defined by what it isn't. Who can explain the use of a golden sunset over a deep blue sea? The reason murmur resonates like poetry in the mind. The revelry and pleasure in melody? What use is color? What good is the excellence of flawless script? All these are valuable in themselves, Being is its own justification. They are good because they are. The beautiful can be no threat to either the good or true for they are an inseparable whole. To seek the beautiful is to seek the good. And both are the revelation of the true.

Art is first order experience. It plays directly on the heart and mind as nothing else.

All art is not great art. Like the stars brightness varies. But, all beauty in art is good. And art that is beautiful, sister both the true and the good, apart which they do not exist. It is great when strong of its kind, obscene and corrupted when not, viz. artless.

On every side we have corrupted art. Art to illustrate to sell products, causes, liaisons and romance. And God knows what else. Prostituted, Art today sells politics and sets agendas.

We've forgotten what must never be forgotten, useless Art is as spiritual life, and adornment of soul.





© 2006 Timothy Martin Gillan Photography




Back

Timothy Martin Gillan Studios